Výber notebooku na štúdium

A public Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) decision built with decisionpoint.io: 4 criteria, 3 alternatives, and 23 pairwise judgments.

Overall ranking

  1. A — 35.9%
  2. C — 34.0%
  3. B — 30.2%

Criteria weights

Overall consistency ratio: 1.74 (above the 0.1 acceptability threshold, so some judgments may be inconsistent).

AI-generated summary

Generated by AI from this decision's data; may not reflect the latest judgments.

Results summary

Option A comes out ahead, but only by a narrow margin of 1.9 percentage points over C. Price is what clinches it for A: it gains a strong advantage of 7.9 percentage points here. Yet A concedes ground on battery life and performance, each by 2.5 percentage points. This decision hinges on how much those performance and endurance shortfalls matter against A's price advantage, since performance itself carries 44.2% weight in your priorities.

Check the sensitivity analysis to see whether small shifts in how you weigh these criteria might change the outcome.

Sensitivity summary

A is a close call over C, leading by 1.9 percentage points. The top choice holds unless weights shift substantially. Three criteria could flip the result with large reweightings: increasing the weight of Výkon from 44.2% to 58.0% brings C to the lead, as does increasing Hmotnosť from 13.4% to 32.6%; increasing Výdrž batérie from 13.6% to 20.6% hands the win to B instead. More modestly, decreasing Cena's weight from 28.8% to 23.5% (a moderate change of 18.4% of its own weight) would let C overtake A. Most of the criteria sit stable in their influence on this decision.

Decision criteria

Alternatives

With JavaScript enabled, this page shows the full interactive decision: the hierarchy, every pairwise comparison on the Saaty 1–9 scale, consistency checking, the calculated priorities, and sensitivity analysis. New to the method? See What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?